Skip to main content

It's NOT a Rhetorical Question

Parents often ask me, in one form or another, why our family court system is so broken.  How can the judges, attorneys, therapists, police officers, etc., who are supposed to protect children fail so miserably?  How can “they” deny due process, violate the First Amendment, ignore the rule of law, and inflict so much pain and suffering on families in the name of justice and get away with it, every day, right here, in the greatest country on earth?

All over the world, people suffer this and worse, I'm sorry to say. Look at Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, the Sudan, Nigeria, to name just a few.  “Injustice” doesn’t begin to capture the reality of those places.  You think because you’re Americans and you live in the "greatest country on earth" that you are guaranteed "liberty and justice."  You entrust your freedoms to others; put yellow-ribbon stickers on your cars; share warm and fuzzy memes on Facebook; choose your elected officials based on a two-second analysis of which bears a "D" or an "R" after their name, and go about living your very privileged lives, secure in your conviction that you have done your part in being a “good” American.

As long as the news is about someone else being arrested, convicted, jailed or having their children removed by the state, you’re just fine trusting that the system works; just fine believing whatever the media tells you to believe; right on board with not rocking the boat; and A-OK with obediently – and blindly – submitting to authority and power.  You sneer at those who don’t play by those rules and feel smug when they wind up jailed, with broken bones, or dead.  You teach your children to follow your lead and support MORE LAWS that would demand that everyone teach the same. 

Until, that is, it happens to you, and then you think, “I’m special,” and “my circumstances are special.”  And you just know that as soon as all those other freedom-loving, brave Americans (like you) find out about the injustice being done TO YOU, they will jump to your rescue and protest against this insult to the principles that all those yellow ribbons and feel-good memes were meant to protect.
 
Except, as you soon discover, there aren't a lot of freedom-loving, brave Americans (like you) to be found that aren't too busy living their very privileged lives to be bothered to do more than post on Facebook or affix a pretty symbol to their car.  Not many who are free anyway, or still alive, or whose bones have sufficiently healed, who can be bothered with the sacrifices and inconveniences that actually being free and ensuring justice for all -  like we all pledge to do - demand.  

So how can “they” – the judges and police officers, etc. - inflict so much injustice, right out in the broad light of day – in plain sight of all those “freedom” loving Americans?  The answer is obvious. Because they can.  Because there’s no one (left) to stop them. Because “we” let them, every day.

The problem is not "them." "They" ARE us. WE are the problem.
We who don’t question beyond what “sounds” right to us;
We who want good government to play like a sports match: root, root, root for the home team because being part of the WINNING team is all that matters and how we win and what we do afterwards doesn’t matter either, so long as we’re declared the winner;
We who are enamored of power and those who wield it and will wield it the same if we’re ever given the opportunity because we want THE POWER, and not the obligations that come with it;
We who don’t care how wealth is accumulated so long as we can be wealthy too because THOSE are the only American principle that really matter anymore: Land of the wealthy and home of the wanna-be wealthy – at all cost, at any price.

Think I’m wrong? Think I’m not talking about YOU?  Then consider this: the next time you hear or sing the national anthem, remember, it ends with a question. Have you always considered it as a rhetorical one? Or do you recognize it for what it really is: a reminder of the vigilance that freedom demands? Because if you think that red, white and blue stars and stripes whipping in the wind are evidence of freedom; that because you are free to sing a song, freedom reigns from sea to shining sea, that playing by the rules that others made for you is “freedom,” then you might want to consider moving to North Korea. You’ll fit right in.  

For the rest of you who actually believe you love this country and the ideals it stands for, then it’s way past time to start walking the talk in the land of the free and the home of the brave.  Here are my top four walks:  

  •       Support a federal constitutional amendment to end absolute immunity for judges and prosecutors.
  •       Organize local Court Watch programs and demand transparency in ALL proceedings.  
  •       Find, support and elect individuals to state and federal legislatures who are committed to repealing, rather than enacting, legislation, especially legislation that favors certain classes, such as attorneys, legislators, judges and executives. 
  •      TEACH your children how to think critically and for themselves and that it is un-American and un-patriotic to ever blindly trust anyone who wields the power to decide what you're NOT free to do. 
Join me ... 


Comments

  1. + Demand laws allowing videotaping of all court proceedings: your witness testimony will be disregarded, your video is your power;

    + demand legislation prohibiting sanctions for raising constitutional arguments in court

    + demand deregulation of the legal profession, removing dependence of your court representatives upon the very government whose misconduct your attorney may need to challenge on your behalf

    Are we hollering in the wilderness here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe, but it's better than being quiet, or at least that's the answer I keep coming back to. The irony is that most of that legislation you are advocating for can be achieved by repealing existing laws, rather than enacting new ones. The idea that more laws keep us free is one of those "true-isms" that we get fed at a really early age and can be hard to shake off. Repeal the laws and regulations that prohibit those things in the first place; I'm down for that. :)

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Unfortunately, I feel it goes much deeper. The "system" is designed to profit off human suffering. PERIOD. It's in everything. The actual "players" don't even matter. Until we end that, it is just little tokens thrown out to people so everyone can keep believing it's working.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Any solutions as to how to end it? I have to say, the "system" is not a distinct entity. It consists of individuals who, collectively, appear to share a common perspective. It's why the First Amendment is so important. Without outside critique and freedom to challenge the collective perspective, change is unlikely. Change in this country has always come when the collective voice of those outside the "system" grew loud enough to overpower the stagnant perspective of those inside the system. This issue is no different than the civil rights movement. The grave injustices existed in plain sight, but entrenched perspectives of the status quo made them nearly invisible to anyone who wasn't directly impacted by them. Our challenge is to organize our voices and build our movement so that we can overcome the stagnant perspective of the status quo. We can do this!

      Delete
  4. Dear Ms. McCool: I have evidence of corruption by judge and appellate but it is useless as Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI, District Attorney, Governor, Mayor, Senator, Judicial Commission, etc refuse to investigate. Even worse - the press is threatened not to print my evidence. Please can you contact me at hurrayforfootball@hotmail.com. I want to send you the evidence as you have enough guts to print it. Thank you and G-d Bless. Chris.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keep the passion https://divorcecorp.wikispaces.com/file/view/Family+Law+Reform.pdf and https://divorcecorp.wikispaces.com/file/view/Florida+Fifth+District+Court+of+Appeal+and+Racketeering.pdf

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roadmap to Disbarment

It should be obvious by now that if someone is determined NOT to know the truth, then it doesn’t matter how much truth is put in front of her or him, the truth will be ignored.  But for anyone interested in facts underlying my journey to disbarment, here they are. The underlying events dealt with allegations of abuse of two small children which gave rise to a custody case in Mississippi, an intra-family adoption case in Louisiana, and a petition seeking emergency relief, also filed in Louisiana. On July 20, 2011, Chancellor Deborah Gambrell, the Mississippi judge presiding over the custody case in Mississippi, issued  an illegal order  affecting custody and visitation of the children. The order was issued without prior notice to mom, and it was done in the judge's chambers so there was no record of what was said. Those two factors alone make is absolutely null, according to the U.S. Constitution and Mississippi law. The order allowed dad to have supervised (by his mother w

Home of the brave?

The author People - mostly people who call themselves republicans - keep asking, "what's wrong with a 'temporary' ban to make sure people coming here aren't terrorists?" Here's my two biggest complaints: 1) There is no evidence that this "temporary" ban (indefinite for Syrian refugees) is based on any imminent threat from those people who have already been subjected to extensive vetting (over two years) and are now cleared to come here but for Trump's ban; and 2) even if the current vet ting process could be better, and keep people here in the US "safer" (from foreign-born terrorists), we are already infinitely safer than so many of the people coming here, and certainly all of the refugees who are fleeing, literally, unimaginable horror, at least if you've lived here you entire life. Is there a risk that a "bad" person will slip past all of the extensive screening we already have in place? Sure - there is abs