Skip to main content

Justice for Harley and Zoey

As horrible as it is to accept, some people who become parents abuse their children. We all know this simply from watching the news.  Every day there's a story about a child hurt or killed by the person that was entrusted to keep them safe - their parent or parents.That's the sad truth. How many of us wish that we could go back in time and rescue Caylee Anthony from her mother, Casey?

Caylee was not saved because no one realized she was in danger from the very person that was supposed to protect her - her mother. That's because abusive parents do not abuse in public; they do not tell their friends; they do not brag on facebook that they just played a sex game with their 5 year old daughter. They hide it from everyone, and if the child tells, they accuse the child of lying or of being manipulated by the other parent.

Harley and her sister Zoey have been telling their mother, their doctors, their therapists, teachers, friends, and family that their daddy has been playing a game with them called "weewees and butts" since they were 4 and 3 years old.

Listen to their 1st disclosure to Raven: http://t.co/g0gvKyQ and a day later, their second: http://t.co/M8kRQDW

Now consider that no judge has ever heard those recordings.  Why? Because for 4.5 years, the judges have simply refuse to do so.  On August 16, 2011, Judge Deborah Gambrell in the Chancery Court of Marion County, Mississippi, once again refused to admit all of Raven's evidence, including these recordings,  and ordered that  Harley and Zoey have visits with their father in the house where they both report having been molested by their father in the past.

Judge Dawn Amacker in the 22nd Judicial District Court for the Parish of St. Tammany in Louisiana is also refusing to hear any evidence or to protect Harley and Zoey, even though the law requires her to have a hearing and to take evidence.

Their dad just keeps calling them liars and saying that their mom is making them say it.  All their mom wants is for a judge to look at ALL the evidence and THEN decide who to believe.  Don't you think Judge Gambrell and Judge Amacker should look at the evidence before they make Harley and Zoey go back to their father's house where there is no one to protect them except the person they are most afraid of?

Harley still loves her daddy. She just wants him to stop doing what he is doing to her.  She does not feel safe with him alone.  She said as much in her journal, but Judge Gambrell refused to allow it as evidence and Judge Amacker just ignored her.

Sign our petition telling the judges that there can be no justice for Harley and Zoey, or any child, if the law and evidence is ignored.  Tell them they must look at the evidence before they make a decision that will affect the rest of Harley and Zoey's lives.  Ask yourself, what if these were your daugthers?

Have questions want to do more to help? Email us at bridge2justice@gmail.com and someone will respond within 24 hours. Want to see more, go to http://db.tt/Zz225Oq and read the writ submitted to the Louisiana Supreme Court on August 12, 2011.

Horrified?  Call the judges and let them know:

Judge Deborah Gambrell, Chancery Court Marion County Mississippi
Phone: (601) 545-6028
Fax: (601) 545-6080
Email Court Administrator: bparham@co.forrest.ms.us

Dawn Amacker, Judge, 22nd JDC, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana
http://www.22ndjdc.org/Judges/Division-L/default.aspx    
Amber Mitchell   Staff Attorney  (985) 809-5420  
Michelle Simon   Secretary   (985) 809-5420  FAX:  (985) 809-5309

The Louisiana Supreme Court (504) 310-2300

Are you a victim of abuse and don't know where to go or how to get help?  Call the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1.800.656.HOPE or find them online at https://ohl.rainn.org/online/  less

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It's NOT a Rhetorical Question

P arents often ask me, in one form or another, why our family court system is so broken.  How can the judges, attorneys, therapists, police officers, etc., who are supposed to protect children fail so miserably?  How can “they” deny due process, violate the First Amendment, ignore the rule of law, and inflict so much pain and suffering on families in the name of justice and get away with it, every day, right here, in the greatest country on earth? All over the world, people suffer this and worse, I'm sorry to say. Look at Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, the Sudan, Nigeria, to name just a few.  “Injustice” doesn’t begin to capture the reality of those places.  You think because you’re Americans and you live in the "greatest country on earth" that you are guaranteed "liberty and justice."  You entrust your freedoms to others; put yellow-ribbon stickers on your cars; share warm and fuzzy memes on Facebook; choose your elected officials based on a two-second

Roadmap to Disbarment

It should be obvious by now that if someone is determined NOT to know the truth, then it doesn’t matter how much truth is put in front of her or him, the truth will be ignored.  But for anyone interested in facts underlying my journey to disbarment, here they are. The underlying events dealt with allegations of abuse of two small children which gave rise to a custody case in Mississippi, an intra-family adoption case in Louisiana, and a petition seeking emergency relief, also filed in Louisiana. On July 20, 2011, Chancellor Deborah Gambrell, the Mississippi judge presiding over the custody case in Mississippi, issued  an illegal order  affecting custody and visitation of the children. The order was issued without prior notice to mom, and it was done in the judge's chambers so there was no record of what was said. Those two factors alone make is absolutely null, according to the U.S. Constitution and Mississippi law. The order allowed dad to have supervised (by his mother w

Home of the brave?

The author People - mostly people who call themselves republicans - keep asking, "what's wrong with a 'temporary' ban to make sure people coming here aren't terrorists?" Here's my two biggest complaints: 1) There is no evidence that this "temporary" ban (indefinite for Syrian refugees) is based on any imminent threat from those people who have already been subjected to extensive vetting (over two years) and are now cleared to come here but for Trump's ban; and 2) even if the current vet ting process could be better, and keep people here in the US "safer" (from foreign-born terrorists), we are already infinitely safer than so many of the people coming here, and certainly all of the refugees who are fleeing, literally, unimaginable horror, at least if you've lived here you entire life. Is there a risk that a "bad" person will slip past all of the extensive screening we already have in place? Sure - there is abs